NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 167 A Crim R 108
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Sepulveda v R [2006] NSWCCA 379
HEARING DATE(S): 19 May 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hislop J at 2; Johnson J at 3
DECISION: 1. Time to file a Notice of Appeal with respect to the second trial extended to 16 May 2006; 2. The appeals against conviction at the first and second trials are dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeals against conviction at two trials - offences of indecent assault and buggery committed against three minors between 1978 and 1984 - complainant covertly recorded conversation in 1999 with Appellant containing admissions - no warrant under Listening Devices Act 1984 authorising recording - whether recording was "reasonably necessary for the protection of the lawful interests" of complainant who recorded conversation - construction of s.5(3)(b)(i) Listening Devices Act 1984 - trial judge erred in holding that requirements of s.5(3)(b)(i) were satisfied - recording admissible under s.138 Evidence Act 1995 - whether trial judge erred by declining to use the "dangerous to convict" formula as part of the direction under Longman v The Queen (1990) 168 CLR 79 - no error established
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Listening Devices Act 1984 Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
Douar v The Queen (2005) 159 A Crim R 154 Longman v The Queen (1990) 168 CLR 79 R v Le (2004) 60 NSWLR 108 Violi v Berrivale Orchards Limited (2000) 99 FCR 580 Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited v Marsden [2000] NSWCA 167 R v Eade (2001) 118 A Crim R 449 Miller v TCN Channel Nine (1988) 36 A Crim R 92 Lawrence v NSW Police Service (2004) 144 A Crim R 396 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] 194 CLR 355 Taciak v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1995) 59 FCR 285 Love v Attorney General for NSW (1990) 169 CLR 307 Commissioner of Police v Barbaro (2001) 51 NSWLR 419 R v Haddad and Treglia (2000) 116 A Crim R 312 Scanruby Pty Ltd v Caltex Petroleum Pty Ltd [2000] NSWIRComm 89 Elcham v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWSC 614 State Drug Crime Commission v Chapman (1988) 12 NSWLR 447 Pelechowski v Registrar of Court of Appeal (NSW) (1999) 198 CLR 435 Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 465 CASES CITED: Udino v Aldo (1998) 16 NSWCCR 418 Taikato v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 454 T v Medical Board of South Australia (1992) 58 SASR 382 R v Smith and Turner (1994) 63 SASR 123 Public Trustee v Alvaro (Supreme Court of South Australia, Legoe J, 19 July 1995, unreported, BC9502314) See v Hardman [2002] NSWSC 234 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v O'Donoghue (1988) 34 A Crim R 397 Kardoulias v R (2005) 159 A Crim R 252 Australian Gas Light Company v Valuer General (1940) 40 SR(NSW) 126 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Limited (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 R v WSP [2005] NSWCCA 427 R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 R v JJB [2006] NSWCCA 126 R v DBG (2002) 133 A Crim R 227 RAK v Western Australia [2006] WASCA 6 New Zealand v Moloney [2006] FCAFC 143 DRE v R [2006] NSWCCA 280 Wade v R [2006] NSWCCA 295 Robinson v R (2006) 162 A Crim R 88
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate