NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 160 A Crim R 526
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Ross v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 65
HEARING DATE(S): 3 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Rothman J at 2; Smart AJ at 3
DECISION: See para 54
CATCHWORDS: Armed robbery with an offensive weapon - combination of longstanding damage to most areas of intellectual function because of frontal lobe brain damage early in life, the consequent lack of education, the dysfunctional family and drug addiction leading to drug induced psychosis at time of offence - judge incorrectly treating certain matters as aggravating features - plea of guilty to armed robbery - first time in custody - head sentence of 5 years manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Hathaway [2005] NSWCCA 368 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 CASES CITED: R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 285 R v Shankley [2003] NSWCCA 253 R v Solomon [2005] NSWCCA 158 R v Street [2005] NSWCCA 139 Veen v The Queen [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465
PARTIES: Michael Anthony Ross v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2008CCAP
COUNSEL: (A) A Francis (C) D Woodburne
SOLICITORS: (A) S O'Connor (C) S Kavanagh
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/31/10344
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Andrew ADCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/2008CCAP MCCLELLAN CJ at CL ROTHMAN J SMART AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate