NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : TUXFORD & ORS v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [2006] NSWSC 182
HEARING DATE(S) : 12 August 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Hulme J at 1
DECISION : Orders deferred
Paul Edward Tuxford PARTIES : Raymond James Lambie David William Rope State of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20222/04
COUNSEL : Plainitffs: P Semmler QC; N Francey Defendant: J Maconachie QC; D Mallon
SOLICITORS : Plaintiffs: Oates & Smith Defendant: IV Knight
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court (Master)
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 12023/2003
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Master Harrison
- 19 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HULME J
Friday, 24 March, 2006
20222/04 Paul Edward TUXFORD AND ORS v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: In these proceedings 3 Plaintiffs sue on their own behalf and on behalf of others. On 15 April 2004, Master Harrison ordered that these proceedings be transferred from the District Court into this Court. On 27 May 2004 she dismissed a Notice of Motion by the Defendant seeking an order under Part 8 Rule 13 of the Supreme Court Rules that the proceedings not be continued as representative proceedings. By Notice of Motion of 23 June 2004 the Defendant appealed from the Master's decision. 2 In the course of an early hearing consequent on that appeal, Mr Joseph SC who was then appearing for the Plaintiff said that the Defendant had also raised what he called "pleading points". Mr Joseph sought an opportunity of further amending the Statement of Claim. Ultimately, by consent, leave to amend was given and an Amended Statement of Claim filed on 22 June 2005. 3 On 25 July 2005 the Defendant filed a further Notice of Motion seeking orders:-
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate