NSW Caselaw
(2006) 65 NSWLR 553 Reported Decision : 198 FLR 200 172 A Crim R 1
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Chi Thanh Cao v R [2006] NSWCCA 89 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 22/02/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 30 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Barr J at 2; Howie J at 3
DECISION: The appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Summing up - directions on intent to possess narcotic goods - whether inadequate.
Customs Act 1901 - s 233B Evidence Act 1995 - ss 89 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Rules - rule 4 Criminal Code (Cth) - ss 3.1, 4.1(1), 4.1(2), 5.2, 5.6(1), 11.1 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act (Vic) 1981 - ss 71, 71AA
R v Reeves (1992) 29 NSWLR 109 R v Skaf (2004) 60 NSWLR 86 R v Saengsai-Or (2004) 61 NSWLR 135 Kural v The Queen (1987) 162 CLR 502 Saad v The Queen (1987) 61 ALJR 243 Pereira v DPP (1988) 63 ALJR 1 R v Veraga [2001] NSWCCA 24 R v Muradian [2002] NSWCCA 371 CASES CITED: R v Lau (1998) 105 A Crim R 167 R v Ruiz-Avila [2003] NSWCCA 264 DPP Reference No. 1 of 2004; R v Nguyen (2005) 154 A Crim R 360 R v Greatorex (1995) 83 A Crim R 416 R v Karam (1998) 105 A Crim R 167 Holland v The Queen (1993) 117 ALR 193 Krakouer v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 202 R v Guliford (2004) 148 A Crim R 558 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 80 ALJR 444
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate