NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave application dismissed by the High Court - 12 June 2008 - [2008] HCASL 355
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Malcolm Douglas Carr trading as Forshaws Neill v. Swart & Ors.; Lawcover Pty. Limited v. Swart & Anor. [2007] NSWCA 337
HEARING DATE(S): 22 October 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Basten JA at 57
DECISION: In proceedings CA 40818/06: 1. Mr. Carr's appeal dismissed. 2. Order that Mr. Carr pay Mr. Swart's costs of the appeal.; In proceedings CA40844/06: 1. Lawcover's appeal allowed. 2. Orders below set aside, and in lieu thereof proceedings dismissed with costs. 3. Mr. Swart to pay Lawcover's costs of the appeal and to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise entitled.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT - LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - INSURANCE - Joint venture agreement between solicitor and investors - Breach of that agreement by solicitor - Damages payable by solicitor to investor - Whether liability for such damages was incurred in connection with the solicitor's practice for the purposes of his professional indemnity policy - Whether the joint venture agreement was a contract to provide legal services.
Dooby v Watson (1888) 39 Ch D 178 Drayton v Martin (1996) 67 FCR 1 CASES CITED: Leary v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 47 FLR 414 Schipp v Cameron [1998] NSWSC 997 Solicitors' Liability Committee v. Gray (1997) 77 FCR 1
Malcolm Douglas Carr trading as Forshaws Neill - appellant Daniel Frederick Victor Swart - respondent PARTIES: Janet Anne Swart - respondent Lawcover Pty. Limited - respondent/appellant Malcolm Douglas Carr - respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate