NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Le Huynh v R [2006] NSWCCA 77
HEARING DATE(S): 23/02/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Simpson J at 62; Hall J at 63
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence allowed. Applicant re-sentenced [ par 59].
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – SENTENCE – guilty plea - supplying a prohibited drug (heroin) - supplying a prohibited drug (heroin) on an ongoing basis - possessing a pistol without being authorised to do so - goods in custody – totality principle – whether manifestly excessive
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act Firearms Act
Johnson v The Queen (2004) 205 ALR 346 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 215 ALR 213 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Giang [2005] NSWCCA 387 CASES CITED: R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Huang: R v Lin [2001] NSWCCA 76 R v Jordan [2002] NSWCCA 228 R v Koklas [2003] NSWCCA 302 R v Mucenski [2004] NSWCCA 299 R v Siljanovski: R v Kostadinovic [2003] NSWCCA 38
PARTIES: Le Huynh v R
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1556
COUNSEL: C Craigie SC - Applicant J Dwyer - Respondent
SOLICITORS: Steve O'Connor - Applicant S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/21/0216
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Shillington DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate