NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Vu v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 2
HEARING DATE(S): 16/01/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 January 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Adams J at 1; Howie J at 2; Price J at 3;
DECISION: orders: (i) The extension of time in which to seek leave to appeal be granted; (ii) Leave to appeal be granted; (iii) Quash the sentence and non–parole period imposed by Williams DCJ (iv) Sentence the applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 6 years to date from 11 July 2004 and expire on 10 July 2010 with a balance of term of 2 years expiring on 10 July 2012.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - appeal against sentence - supply of not less than commercial quantity of prohibited drug - parity of sentences - evaluation of roles - applicant's lesser role not reflected in sentence - justifiable sense of grievance - applicant re-sentenced.
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 25 (2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 54B
Lowe v The Queen (1985) 154 CLR 606 MLP v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 271 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v Anderson NSWCCA 25 March 1993 R v Boney [2001] NSWCCA 432 CASES CITED: R v Ilbay [2000] NSWCCA 251 R v Kollas & Mitchell [2002] NSWCCA 491 R v Laurentiu & Becheru (1962) 63 A Crim R 402 R v Le Cerf (1975) 13 SASR 237 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 252 Tien Vu v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 188
PARTIES: Van Phu Vu Regina
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate