NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) NSW ConvR 56-163
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Westfield Management Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [2006] NSWSC 716 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 8/06/06 - 9/06/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 July 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
DECISION : Declaration that right of way extends to permit dominant owner to authorise persons to use right of way to access dominant tenement and then proceed to remoter properties
CATCHWORDS : EASEMENTS – rights of carriageway – construction – admissibility of evidence of surrounding circumstances – whether grant of right of way appurtenant to lot A extends to permit dominant owner to authorise persons to use right of way to access dominant tenement and then proceed to remoter adjacent properties of dominant owner (lot B) – rule in Harris v Flower – right of way "for all purposes" – where parties to grant contemplated that dominant tenement would be a means of access to remoter properties.
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 181A(1) and Sch 8 Pt 1
Alamdo Holdings Pty Limited v Australia Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Limited [2004] NSWSC 487 Alvis v Harrison (1991) 62 P&CR 10 British Railway Board v Glass [1965] Ch 538 Cannon v Villars (1878) 8 Ch D 415, 420 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 Ferella v Otvosi (2005) 64 NSWLR 101 Finlayson v Campbell (1997) 8 BPR 15 Gallagher v Rainbow (1994) 179 CLR 624 Harris v Flower (1904) 74 LJCh 127 Jelbert v Davis [1968] 1 WLR 589 Kyren Pty Ltd v Cinema Place Pty Ltd [2006] SASC 93 Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 181 Nickerson v Barraclough [1980] Ch 325 Owners Corp, Strata Plan No. 8450 v Owners Corp, Strata Plan No. 54547 [2002] NSWSC 780 Paterson & Barr Limited v University of Otago [1925] NZLR 191 Peacock v Custins [2001] 2 All ER 827 CASES CITED : Proprietors Strata Plan No. 9968 v Proprietors Strata Plan No. 11173 [1979] 2 NSWLR 605 Re Attorney General for the Australian Capital Territory (1990) 26 FCR 82 Re Ellenborough Park [1956] Ch 131 Rodwell v G R Evans & Co Pty Ltd (1977) 3 BPR 9114 Ryde Municipal Council v Macquarie University (1978) 139 CLR 633 Scott v Martin [1987] 1 WLR 841 Shean Pty Ltd v Owners of Corinne Court [2001] WASCA 311 Simpson v Mayor of Godmanchester [1897] AC 696 Skull v Glenister 33 LJCP 185; 16 CB (NS) 81 South Eastern Railway Co v Cooper [1924] 1 Ch 211 SS & M Ceramics v Kin [1996] 2 QdR 540 Strata Plan No 8450 [2002] NSWSC 780 The Shannon Limited v Venner Limited [1965] Ch 682 Toll (FGCT) Pty Limited v Alphapharm Pty Limited (2004) 219 CLR 165 Waterpark v Fennell (1859) 7 HLC 650 White v Grand Hotel Eastbourne Limited [1913] 1 Ch 113 Williams v James (1867) LR 2 CP 577
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate