NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Short v Crawley (No. 30) [2007] NSWSC 1322
HEARING DATE(S) : 13/02/06 – 17/02/06, 20/02/06 – 24/02/06, 27/02/06 – 02/03/06, 06/03/06 – 10/03/06, 13/03/06 – 17/03/06, 20/03/06 – 23/03/06, 27/03/06 – 31/03/06, 03/04/06 – 07/04/06, 10/04/06 – 12/04/06, 21/04/06, 01/05/06, 04/05/06, and 08/05/06 – 12/05/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 November 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : Plaintiffs to bring in short minutes of order in accordance with the reasons.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – Oppression – Numerous instances of oppression by director of companies – Remedies – Winding up – Whether discretion to order winding up should be exercised – Order to wind up a solvent company only as a last resort – Appropriate remedy a compulsory purchase order – Valuation of shares. - EQUITY – Fiduciary duties – Causation – Breach of obligation to act for proper purpose distinguished from failure to disclose improper purpose – Consideration of application of principle in London Loan and Savings Co of Canada v Brickenden [1934] 3 DLR 465 – Director precluded from alleging would have derived profits irrespective of improper purpose – Liable to account for profits derived – No liability to pay equitable compensation where loss would have occurred irrespective of breach of duty. - EQUITY – Breach of fiduciary duty – Remedies – Account of profits – Director and third party company under his control each received benefit from director's breach of duty – Third party company with full knowledge that profits derived by reason of fiduciary's breach – Purpose of account of profits considered – Each liable to account for profits derived by them from fiduciary's breach – Entitlement to claim just allowances for skill, expertise and labour. - EQUITY – Fiduciary duties – Conflict of interest – Director owing concurrent fiduciary duties as solicitor – Duties as director owed in addition to duties owed as solicitor – Onus on fiduciary to show that fully informed consent obtained – What constitutes fully informed consent – Circumstances requiring independent advice. - LIMITATION PERIODS – Application of Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) by analogy – General rule that statutory limitation period applied by analogy only if court satisfied it is just to do so – Where account ordered for breach of fiduciary duty not constituting a breach of trust, analogy prima facie drawn between action to account at law and action to account in equity – Limitation period applicable to account at law applied where reliance on statute of limitations by analogy not unconscionable. - EQUITY – General principles – Equitable defences – Laches and delay – Equitable doctrine of laches applies where Limitation Act does not apply either directly or by analogy. - EQUITY – Fiduciary duties – Directors' duties to shareholders – Consideration of circumstances in which directors may owe fiduciary duties to shareholders. - MEETINGS – Voting – Circumstances in which directors interested in transaction may vote on resolution to enter into transaction – Articles providing that interested director may vote where disclosure in certain manner made – s 231, Corporations Law - s 123, Companies Act 1961 (NSW) – Whether Article applicable where only two directors, both personally interested in transaction – Continuing underlying requirement that directors act in accordance with fiduciary duties when voting notwithstanding that declaration of interest made in accordance with articles.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate