NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Ainger v Coffs Harbour City Council (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 212 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 August 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; McColl JA at 2; Hunt AJA at 46
DECISION: 1. Costs of the claimant of the first trial to be paid by the opponent on a solicitor/client basis; 2. No order as to the costs of the motion.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS – costs of appeal – offer of compromise made by plaintiff before trial under DCR Pt 39A r 25 – plaintiff sought indemnity costs for trial and appeal – whether offer relevant to costs of appeal –neither DCR or SCR apply – costs order in discretion of the court – court considers circumstances at time offer made – no fresh offer made between trial and appeal – discretion to order costs of appeal on an indemnity basis turned on demonstrating unreasonable or delinquent conduct on the part of the party against whom order sought – no such conduct demonstrated – motion for indemnity costs of appeal refused - COSTS – costs of trial – application of UCPR to offer of compromise made under DCR Pt 39A r 25 – costs awarded on a solicitor/client basis - COSTS – offers of compromise – relevance of change in legal outlook to reasonableness of rejection of offer – principles.
Civil Procedure Act 2005 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 LEGISLATION CITED: District Court Rules 1973 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Ainger v Coffs Harbour City Council [2005] NSWCA 424 Baresic v Slingshot Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 160 Benham v Gambling [1941] AC 157 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council; Ghantous v Hawkesbury Shire Council [2001] HCA 29; (2001) 206 CLR 512 Brymount Pty Limited t/a Watson Toyota v Cummins and Anor; Young Shire Council v Cummins and Anor (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 69 Coombes v Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 70 Cumper v Pothecary [1941] 2 KB 58 Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press (1995) 38 NSWLR 404 Hillier v Sheather (1995) 36 NSWLR 414 Horseshoe Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v Murray Smith (trading as South Coast Tile & Slate Company) (Court of Appeal, 7 November 1995, unreported) Huntsman Chemical Co Australia Ltd v International Pools Australia Pty Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 242 Maitland Hospital v Fisher (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 721 Maricic v Dalma Formwork (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 237 Moore v Woodforth (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 46 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 CASES CITED: Mulligan v Coffs Harbour City Council [2005] HCA 63; (2005) 223 CLR 486 Mutual Life and Citizens' Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt [1968] HCA 74; (1968) 122 CLR 556 Newcastle City Council v Lindsay [2004] NSWCA 198 NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Reeve (1993) 42 NSWLR 100 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Port Stephens Shire Council v Tellamist Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 415 R T & Y E Falls Investments Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 86 Rolls Royce Industrial Power (Pacific) Ltd (Formerly John Thompson (Australia) Pty Ltd) v James Hardie & Co Pty Ltd (Pacific) Limited [2001] NSWCA 461; (2001) 53 NSWLR 626 South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service v King [2006] NSWCA 2 South Sydney Council v Morris (No 3) [2001] NSWCA 200 Southern Area Health Service v Brown (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 19 State of New South Wales v Burton [2006] NSWCA 43 Suresh v Jacon Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 270 Temora Shire Council v Stein [2004] NSWCA 236 Thompson v Woolworths (Queensland) Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 19; (2005) 221 CLR 234 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62; (2005) 223 CLR 422 Webb v South Australia (1982) 56 ALJR 912
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate