NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Ka Chung Fung v R [2007] NSWCCA 250
HEARING DATE(S): 19 July 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 August 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Kirby J at 2; Latham J at 3
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Conviction appeal - omission from summing up of direction on element of offence - Rule 4 and application of proviso - direction on accused's good character - no fixed formula - no substantial miscarriage of justice.
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
R v Lau [1998] 105 A Crim R 167 R v Micalizzi [2004] NSWCCA 406 R v Moussa [2001] NSWCCA 427 R v Gulliford (2004) 148 A Crim R 558 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 223 ALR 662 ; [2005] HCA 81 Wilde (1988) 164 CLR 365: 31 A Crim R 331 R v Tripodina & Morabito (1988) 35 A Crim R 183 CASES CITED: Wilde v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 365 Krakouer v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 202 Holland v R (1993) 117 ALR 193 R v Cao (2006) 65 NSWLR 552 R v Stalder [1981] 2 NSWLR 9 R v Telfer (2004) 142 A Crim R 132 ; [2004] NSWCCA 27 R v Robinson [1999] NSWCCA 172 R v Gillard CCA unreported 15 July 1991 R v Courtney-Smith (No 2) (1990) 48 A Crim R 49
PARTIES: Appellant - Ka Chung FUNG Respondent - Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/4759 (FORMERLY 2007/868)
COUNSEL: Appellant - CV Jeffreys Respondent - J Girdham
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate