NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bennett v Goodwin [2006] NSWSC 347
HEARING DATE(S) : 27 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 27 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/27/2006
DECISION : Declaration of existence of security interest made. Amendment of order refused.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Supreme Court procedure - miscellaneous procedural matters - whether appropriate to make declaration of existence of a security interest, when no consequential orders claimed - PROCEDURE - Supreme Court procedure - miscellaneous procedural matters - application of slip rule to amend an order made in consequence of legal advisor's failure to put a relevant argument - circumstances when appropriate to use slip rule to correct legal advisor's omission
LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Bennett v Goodwin [2005] NSWSC 513 Bennett v Goodwin [2005] NSWSC 930 CASES CITED : Bennett v Goodwin [2005] NSWSC 1256 Bennett v Goodwin [2005] (unreported, Campbell J, 27 September 2005) L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd and Anor v The Council of the City of Parramatta (No 2) (1983) 151 CLR 590
PARTIES : Gail Margaret Bennett - Plaintiff Clark Philip Ross Goodwin - First Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5085/04
COUNSEL : M Bechelli, solicitor - Plaintiff N Obrart - First Defendant
SOLICITORS : Kingston Swift - Plaintiff Jackson Smith - First Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EQUITY LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate