NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bruce Harvey and Anor v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1436
HEARING DATE(S) : 6 June 2005, 7 June 2005, 8 June 2005, 9 June 2005, 10 June 2005, 14 June 2005, 15 June 2005, 16 June 2005, 25 August 2005, 28 November 2005, 29 November 2005, 30 November 2005, 5 December 2005, 6 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 13 December 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 December 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
DECISION : 1. Verdict and judgment for the Defendant ; 2. Plaintiffs to pay the Defendant's costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - misleading and deceptive conduct claim against State of New South Wales for false and misleading statements made by officer of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs - whether ostensible authority established to render State of New South Wales liable - whether Plaintiff put on inquiry by circumstances of dealing with officer - whether Department of Aboriginal Affairs carrying on business for purposes of Fair Trading Act 1987 - whether State of New South Wales vicariously liable for acts of officer - whether officer engaged in a frolic of his own - whether direct liability in negligence established against State of New South Wales arising from appointment of officer to departmental position and supervision of him
Fair Trading Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Vicarious Liability) Act 1983 Real Property Act 1900 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
De Gioia v Darling Island Stevedoring & Lightecage Co Ltd (1941) 42 SR(NSW) 1 Challenge Finance Limited for Forshaw (No 4) (1995) 217 ALR 264 Hunt v Watkins (2000) 49 NSWLR 508 Carr v Baker (1936) 36 SR(NSW) 301 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 101 Sirway Asia Pacific Pty Limited v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] FCA 1152 Paramedical Services Pty Limited v Ambulance Service of NSW [1999] FCA 548 State of New South Wales v RT & YE Falls Investments Pty Limited (2003) 57 NSWLR 1 Meadow Gem Pty Limited v ANZ Executors and Trustee Company Limited (Supreme Court of Victoria, Hedigan J, 18 May 1994, BC9401058); (1994) ATPR (Digest) 46-130 Northside Developments Pty Limited v Registrar General (1990) 170 CLR 146 Pacific Carriers Limited v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451 CASES CITED : Freeman and Lockyer v Brockhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Limited (1964) 2 QB 480 Essington Investments Pty Limited v Regency Property Pty Limited [2004] NSWCA 375 Armagas Limited v Mundogas SA (1986) AC 717 Deatons Pty Limited v Flew (1949) 79 CLR 370 State of New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 Starks v RSM Security Pty Limited [2004] NSWCA 351 Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434 R v Watkins [2005] NSWCCA 164 Neill v NSW Fresh Food & Ice Pty Limited (1963) 108 CLR 362 Vozza v Tooth & Co Limited (1964) 112 CLR 316 Kingshott v Goodyear Tyre & Rubber Co Australia Limited (No. 2) (1987) 8 NSWLR 707 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL and Others (1992-1994) 179 CLR 332 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Limited (1990) 169 CLR 638
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate