NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bidald Consulting v Miles Special Builders; Bidald Consulting v Miles Special Builders [2006] NSWSC 434
HEARING DATE(S) : 17 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 May 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
DECISION : Costs of deed termination application are costs in respect of the application for the order for winding up.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – plaintiff's application to vary costs orders made in favour of plaintiff - where plaintiff succeeded in its application to terminate a Deed of Company Arrangement and subsequently obtained orders for the winding up of the defendant – where termination of Deed was a statutory precondition to the making of the order for winding up – whether costs of the deed termination application are costs in respect of the application for the order for winding up under section 556(1)(b) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether statutory requirement under section 466 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that applicant for winding up bear its own costs until a liquidator has been appointed militates against cost orders sought by plaintiff – policy considerations – whether plaintiff's costs of deed termination proceedings can be characterised as expenses properly incurred by deed administrators under section 556(1)(a) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether plaintiff's costs of deed termination proceedings can be characterised as other expenses of deed administrators under section 556(1)(dd) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Supreme Court Procedure – where liquidator appointed after Deed of Company Arrangement terminated and deed administrators no longer have carriage of proceedings on behalf of the defendant - whether deed administrators should be granted leave to be heard on plaintiff's application – CORPORATIONS – Deed of Company Arrangement and winding up – order of priority of claims in winding up – whether costs of deed termination application are costs in respect of the order for winding up under section 556 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether orders sought by plaintiff interfere with administrators' entitlement to remuneration and expenses – administrator's right of indemnity – administrator's lien securing right of indemnity – property over which lien extends – non-effect of order of priority of unsecured claims under section 556 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) on right of indemnity to the extent that it is secured by lien – no ruling on whether administrator has a lien on this application – WORDS AND PHRASES – "in respect of"
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate