NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NSW Crime Commission v Ollis [2006] NSWSC 459
HEARING DATE(S) : 28 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 May 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J at 1
DECISION : (1) Pursuant to Rule 13.1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 judgment is given for the plaintiff on its claim for a proceeds assessment order against the first defendant for an amount to be assessed by the Court; (2) The first defendant pay the plaintiff's costs.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Procedure - criminal assets recovery - serious criminal activity and illegal activity - whether proceeds of crime to be assessed include proceeds from illegal activity - whether court must specify illegal activity at time of making initial Proceeds Recovery Order - interim orders in assets recovery process
LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1900 (NSW)
CASES CITED : NSW Crime Commission v Ollis (unreported, NSWSC, Rothman J, 21 April 2006)
P - NSW Crime Commission D1 - Victor Warren OLLIS D2 - Gail Anne SHIELDS (aka Gail Anne LYE and Gail Anne OLLIS) PARTIES : D3 - Aaron Gregory LYE D4 - Christopher LYE D5 - Koala Development Pty Ltd (ACN 116 719 754) D6 - Parkes Airport Business Centre Pty Ltd (ACN 116 261 913) D7 - Parkes Airport Construction Pty Ltd (ACN 117 091 737)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10278/2006
COUNSEL : P - Mr I Temby QC D's - Mr Dibb
SOLICITORS : P - Mr J Giorgiutti D's - Mr H Karimjee
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
JUSTICE ROTHMAN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate