NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 177 A Crin R 348
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Ul-Haque [2007] NSWSC 1251 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 15/10/07, 16/10/07, 17/10/07, 18/10/07, 19/10/07, 22/10/07, 23/10/07, 24/10/07, 25/10/07, 26/10/07, 30/10/07, 31/10/07, 2/11/07, 5/11/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1
DECISION : The records of interview of 7 and 12 November 2003 and 9 January 2004 are inadmissible.
CATCHWORDS : Admissibility of interviews with AFP - prior improper conduct by ASIO - whether ASIO conduct criminal - false imprisonment - kidnapping - meaning of "oppressive" - onus of proof
Criminal Code s102.5(1), 100.1, 102.1 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900, s86 Evidence Act 1995, s84, 85, 138
Davis v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 392 R v D [1984] AC 778 R v DMC (2002) 137 A Crim R 246 CASES CITED : R v Linsberg (1905) 69 JP 107 R v Wellard [1978] 3 All ER 161 Re Bolton; ex parte Beane (1987) 162 CLR 514 Ruddock v Taylor [2005] HCA 48 at 137 Trobridge v Hardy (1955) 94 CLR 147
PARTIES : Regina Izhar Ul-Haque
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2005/422
Crown: Mr G. J. Bellew SC/ Mr M.C. Bracks COUNSEL : Accused: Mr I. Barker QC/ Mr P. Lange Cth: Mr L. Robberds QC
Crown: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions SOLICITORS : Accused: Lawyers Corp Cth: Australian Government Solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate