NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 200 FLR 44
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Comptroller-General of Customs v Stephen Edward Parker [2006] NSWSC 390
HEARING DATE(S) : 12 - 15, 18 - 21, 26 - 27 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J
DECISION : 1. (i) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence of moving or interfering, without authorisation of the Customs Act 1901, between 1 August 1987 and 31 May 1990, goods that were subject to the control of Customs; (ii) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 1 August 1987 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $1,447,061.70 payable on 43,054.5 litres of alcohol liquid (being Scotch whisky); (iii) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 13 November 1987 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $90,457.95 payable on 2,691.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (iv) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 17 June 1988 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (v) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 27 June 1988 and 31 May 1990 he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (vi) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 27 June 1988 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (vii) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 28 July 1988 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (viii) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 31 July 1988 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (ix) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 19 September 1989 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (x) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 6 October 1989 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (xi) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 25 January 1990 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (xii) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 29 January 1990 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (xiii) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 30 January 1990 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); (xiv) that Stephen Edward Parker is convicted of the offence that, between 31 January 1990 and 31 May 1990, he evaded duty of $143,259.26 payable on 4,262.4 litres of alcohol liquid (Scotch whisky); 2. I stand the matter over for further consideration as to the consequences of these orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate