NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Huntingdon v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 196
HEARING DATE(S): 25 June 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 July 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; James J at 2; Hislop J at 3
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Sentencing - De Simoni principle - Backdating sentence - Special circumstances - Sentence not manifestly excessive.
Crimes Act 1900 - ss 61, 61L, 61M LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - ss 21A , 24, 47 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6(3)
Markarian v R (2005) 215 ALR 213 R v Button (2002) 54 NSWLR 455 R v Close (1992) 31 NSWLR 743 R v Cook (1999) NSWCCA 234 R v De Simoni (1980-1981) 147 CLR 383 CASES CITED: R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Hajjo NSWCCA (unreported 31 August 1992) R v John David (unreported NSWCCA 20 April 1995) R v Niass (unreported NSWCCA 16 November 1988) R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Wickham (2004) NSWCCA 193 R v Yang (2003) 135 A Crim R 237
PARTIES: Applicant - Adam Kevin Huntingdon Respondent - Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/1058
COUNSEL: Applicant - Mr T. Gartelmann Respondent - Mr R. Herps
SOLICITORS: Applicant - T & A Legal Respondent - Director of Public Prosecutions (New South Wales)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): Mahoney DCJ
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: 06/41/0083
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate