NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 164 A Crim R 1
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: JCS v REGINA , JMS v REGINA, REGINA v JCS, REGINA v JMS [2006] NSWCCA 221
HEARING DATE(S): 24 May 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 July 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; James J at 95; Hoeben J at 96
DECISION: 1. Both appeals against conviction dismissed; 2. Crown appeals against both sentences dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - unlawful imprisonment - appeal against conviction - joint and several offences - validity of indictment for unlawful imprisonment - common law offence - inconsistencies in complainant's evidence - whether open to the jury to accept complainant's evidence - whether necessary to be against the will of the complainant - meaning of constraining and restraining - directions on element of intent - relevance of complainant's state of mind - whether direction on drawing of inferences necessary - whether directions correctly addressed actions of an individual not part of the joint criminal enterprise - parental discipline - whether evidence available on each separate count was adequately distinguished from evidence not available - EVIDENCE - whether document, which the complainant had not adopted, ought to have been admitted - re-examination of the complainant - CRIMINAL LAW - unlawful imprisonment - Crown appeal against sentence - objective gravity - general deterrence - unusual offence - whether mitigating factors were 'double-counted' - special circumstances - parental difficulties as mitigating factors - complainant's age and condition as aggravating factors - impact of periodic detention - discretion not to intervene
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 NSW Evidence Act 1995 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate