NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Austress Freyssinet v Kowalski [2007] NSWSC 1105
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 October 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 October 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
DECISION : Orders for examination and production of documents, and for plaintiffs' costs
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - order for examination and production of documents under s 108 Civil Procedure Act - whether s 108 permits orders in aid of enforcement of an injunction - discretionary considerations
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 108 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Pt 38
Austress-Freyssinet Pty Ltd v Kowalski [2007] NSWSC 399 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 1 CASES CITED : Martinek v Evans (2004) 211 ALR 651 McCormack v National Australia Bank Ltd (1992) 35 FCR 303 Mullins v Southern Goldfields Ltd (unreported, Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, Malcolm CJ, Wallace and Rowland JJ, 24 April 1990, BC 9001368) Republic of Costa Rica v Strousberg (1880) 16 ChD 8
Austress Freyssinet Pty Ltd (P1/A) Austress - PSC Design Pty Ltd (P2/A) PARTIES : Freyssinet SAS (P3/A) Immer (No.141) Pty Ltd (P4/A) Andrew Anthony Kowalski (D/R)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3164/06
COUNSEL : M A Izzo (P/A) S R Meehan (D/R)
SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (P/A) Harris Freidman Hyde Page (D/R)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION DUTY LIST
AUSTIN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate