NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 182 A Crim R 1
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 6) [2006] NSWSC 1422
HEARING DATE(S) : 11 December 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 12 December 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/12/2006
DECISION : See paragraphs 36 to 41.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - application for voir dire in support of objection to evidence as being improperly obtained for purpose of s.138 Evidence Act 1995 - similar voir dire in advance of earlier trial of accused on same grounds - lengthy oral evidence given on voir dire - objection failed at earlier trial and evidence admitted - whether Crown witnesses ought be recalled to give evidence on voir dire before retrial - whether transcript of evidence given on earlier voir dire ought be received
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995
R v Petroulias (No. 1) [2006] NSWSC 788 R v Callaghan (2001) 4 VR 79 R v Lars (1994) 73 A Crim R CASES CITED : R v Meier (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 21 May 1996, unreported, BC9601936) R v Taylor (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 April 1995, unreported, BC9507219 at pages 25-26) Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Goodrich Aerospace Pty Ltd v Arsic [2006] NSWCA 187
PARTIES : Regina (Commonwealth) (Crown) Nikytas Nicholas Petroulias (Accused)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2002/93
COUNSEL : Mr P Hastings QC; Mr C Hoy (Crown) Mr R Sutherland SC; Mr G Walsh (Accused)
SOLICITORS : Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Coadys (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate