NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 162 A Crim R 88
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192
HEARING DATE(S): 10 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Simpson J at 20; Johnson J at 21
DECISION: Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - gaol murder - function and duty of trial judge in summing up to jury - trial judge leaves factual basis for conviction to jury which had not been advanced by Crown - whether unfairness to appellant giving rise to miscarriage of justice - adequacy of directions concerning evidence of prisoner witnesses called by Crown - whether "dangerous to convict" direction was required - whether verdict of jury was unreasonable
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986
R v Clough (1992) 28 NSWLR 396 Davies v Director of Public Prosecutions [1954] AC 378 Tripodi v The Queen (1961) 104 CLR 1 Jenkins v The Queen [2004] HCA 57; 211 ALR 116 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301 Conway v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 203 Kanaan v R [2006] NSWCCA 109 Bromley v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 315 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 R v Spencer [1987] AC 128 Carr v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 314 Kelleher v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 534 Pollitt v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 558 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 R v Clarke (1997) 97 A Crim R 414 R v BWT (2002) 54 NSWLR 241 R v SJB [2002] NSWCCA 163; 129 A Crim R 572 R v WSP [2005] NSWCCA 427 Attorney General's Reference No 1 of 2001 [2001] WASCA 316 Crisafio v R [2003] WASCA 104; 27 WAR 169; 141 A Crim R 98 RBK v The Queen [2004] WASCA 216 Angliss v Western Australia [2005] WASCA 162 Kemp v Western Australia [2006] WASCA 6 Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75 Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru) v Fowler (1984) 154 CLR 627 Jago v District Court of New South Wales (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23 Phillips v The Queen (1985) 159 CLR 45 CASES CITED: McKinney v The Queen (1991) 171 CLR 468 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 Carter v Northmore Hale Davy and Leake (1995) 183 CLR 121 R v Fuller (1994) 34 NSWLR 233 R v Wilson [2005] 62 NSWLR 346 R v NZ [2005] 63 NSWLR 628 R v Robinson [2000] NSWSC 541 R v Robinson [2003] NSWCCA 188 R v Robinson [2004] NSWSC 465 Wilson v The Queen (1991-1992) 174 CLR 313 R v Solomon (1980) 1 NSWLR 321 R v King (1985) 17 A Crim R 184 King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423 R v GAS (1998) 3 VR 862 R v Carr (2000) 117 A Crim R 272 R v Franco (2003) 139 A Crim R 228 Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657 Nudd v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 614 The Queen v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635 R v Ronen (2004) 62 NSWLR 707 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 80 ALJR 444 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 Tran v The Queen (2000) 105 FCR 182 R v Pureau (1990) 19 NSWLR 372 R v Whitfield [2002] NSWCCA 501 R v RTB [2002] NSWCCA 104 R v Heuston (1995) 81 A Crim R 387 Kanaan and Ors v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 109 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate