NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: FOGGO v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 364
HEARING DATE(S): 10 September 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 December 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Adams J at 106; Smart AJ at 115
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – miscarriage of justice – Circumstances not involving miscarriage or in which miscarriage not substantial – improper rejection of evidence – witnesses – cross-examination – where cross-examination of complainant's actual response given to a question in an intercepted conversation disallowed – where complainant should have been cross-examined - CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – miscarriage of justice – Circumstances not involving miscarriage or in which miscarriage not substantial – where cross-examination disallowed but should have been permitted – no substantial miscarriage of justice - CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – miscarriage of justice – Circumstances not involving miscarriage or in which miscarriage not substantial – other irregularities – permitting improper cross examination – improper comment – where comment framed as an irrelevant question – where some questioning framed improperly – where some questioning relevant - CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – miscarriage of justice – Circumstances not involving miscarriage or in which miscarriage not substantial – where taken as a whole questioning did not involved a substantial miscarriage of justice - CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – particular grounds – unreasonable or insupportable verdict – where appeal dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CASES CITED: Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30, 235 ALR 517
PARTIES: Douglas FOGGO REGINA
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3153
COUNSEL: Appellant: P M Strickland SC/ M Buscombe Respondent: M Barr
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate