NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: DFS v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 77 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 20 March 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 March 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Barr J at 2; Hoeben J at 25
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentencing - whether sentences excessive compared with those imposed on co-offenders - whether sentences excessive
PARTIES: DFS, Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/2822
COUNSEL: T S Corish V Lydiard
SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh SE O'Connor
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/31/0438
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Coolahan DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/2822
McCLELLAN CJ at CL BARR J HOEBEN J
27 MARCH 2007 DFS v REGINA Judgment 1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL : I agree with Barr J. 2 BARR J : The applicant, whom I shall call DFS, seeks leave to appeal against sentences imposed in the District Court. Having pleaded guilty in the Children's Court the applicant was committed to the District Court for sentence. It was convenient for the Crown to restate the several charges and two Indictments were presented, each accompanied by a schedule under the provisions of s32 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act . The first Indictment was as follows - (1) On or about 30 May 2004 at Cooks Hill the applicant stole a motor vehicle namely a Nissan Coupe XIP 909 the property of Scott McKenzie.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate