NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2006] NSWSC 626
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 June 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : No order as to costs of interlocutory injunction application.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [553], [573] - Costs - General rule - Costs follow the event - Costs of whole action - Generally - Plaintiff generally successful - Defendants win on some issues - Departing from the general rule - Powers of court - Relevant principle - Whether claims distinct - Whether issues intertwined.
Booksan Pty Ltd, Jaymay Constructions Pty Ltd v Wehbe, Elmir & Others [2006] NSWCA 103 Harry Smith Car Sales Pty Ltd v Claycom Vegetable Supply Co Pty Ltd (1978) 29 ACTR 21 CASES CITED : Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq); Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 480 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2003] NSWSC 262 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2006] NSWSC 336 Rose v Richards [2005] NSWSC 758
His Grace Metropolitan Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand (P1) The Very Reverend Father Mitko Mitrev (P2) Lambe Mitreski (D1) Pero Damceski (D2) PARTIES : Boris Minovski (D3) Eftim Eftimov (D4) Mile Marcevski (D5) Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated (D6) Naum Despotovski (D8) Attorney General for State of NSW (D9)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3369/97
T G R Parker SC and R E Steele (Ps) COUNSEL : G O Blake SC (Ds1 - 6 & 8) No appearance (D9)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate