NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Gallant v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 339
HEARING DATE(S): 06/10/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 October 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Adams J at 2; Howie J at 3
DECISION: The appeal against conviction is dismissed. Leave to appeal against sentence is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Practice and Procedure - Omission by defence counsel to lead character evidence - whether miscarriage of justice resulted - whether directions on consent erroneous or misleading - Sentence - relevance of character evidence - failure of judge to refer to special circumstances in setting non-parole period.
Crimes Act 1900 - ss 61R(2)(d), 412 (now repealed), 611 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 - ss 110(2), 137 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure ) Act 1999 - s 44
Seymour v R [2006] NSWCCA 206 R v Gust [1999] NSWCCA 265 Melbourne v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 1 Melbourne, cf R v Lewis [2001] NSWCCA 345 R v Makiski (2004) 151 A Crim R 245 CASES CITED: Nudd v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 614 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Thomas [2006] NSWCCA 313 R v Kaliti [2001] NSWCCA 268 R Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704
PARTIES: Peter John Gallant v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/1623
COUNSEL: D. Frearson SC - Crown P. Boulten SC - Applicant
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh - Crown P. Katsoolis - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate