NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 169 A CRIM R 452
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Pavitt v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 88 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 28 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 April 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McColl JA at 1; Adams J at 144; Latham J at 1
DECISION: Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Evidence — Criminal trial — admissions — discretion to exclude — covertly recorded conversation between accused and complainant facilitated by police —whether conversation constituted breach of accused's right to silence — whether conversation was the functional equivalent of an interrogation by an agent of the State - Evidence — discretion to exclude evidence — complaint evidence — whether evidence of previous complaints admissible under s 108(3) Evidence Act to restore complainant's credibility in anticipation of suggestion by defence that complainant's evidence was a fabrication - Criminal Law and Procedure — whether summing up to jury adequate — whether trial judge discharged obligation to ensure a fair trial of the accused — whether verdict unreasonable and inconsistent with evidence
Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Listening Devices Act 1984 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Bunning v Cross [1978] HCA 22; (1978) 141 CLR 54 Carr v State of Western Australia [2006] HCATrans 582 Domican v The Queen [1992] HCA 13; (1992) 173 CLR 555 EM v The Queen [2007] HCATrans 65 Foster v The Queen [1992] HCA 63; (1993) 67 ALJR 550 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 MacKenzie v R [1996] HCA 35; (1996) 190 CLR 348 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Burt [1998] QCA 423; [2000] 1 Qd R 28 R v Carter [2000] VSCA 6; (2000) 1 VR 175 R v Davidson and Moyle; Ex parte Attorney-General (Q) [1996] 2 Qd R 505 R v Davis [1999] NSWCCA 15 R v DH [2000] NSWCCA 360 R v DWH [1999] NSWCCA 255 R v Heffernan; R v Peters (16 June 1998, unreported, BC9802596) R v Ireland [1970] HCA 21; (1970) 126 CLR 321 R v Jeffries (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 284 CASES CITED: R v M [2002] QCA 486; (2002) 135 A Crim R 324 R v Niass [2005] NSWCCA 120 R v Reardon [2002] NSWCCA 203 R v Selsby [2004] NSWCCA 381 R v Singh-Bal (1997) 92 A Crim R 397 R v Sophear Em [2003] NSWCCA 374 R v Stone (unreported, 13 December 1954) R v Swaffield; Pavic v R [1998] HCA 1; (1998) 192 CLR 159 R v Tillot (1991) 53 A Crim R 46 R v Whitmore [1999] NSWCCA 247 R v Workman [2004] NSWCCA 213; (2004) 60 NSWLR 47 Ridgeway v R [1995] HCA 33; (1995) 184 CLR 19 RPS v The Queen [2000] HCA 3; (2000) 199 CLR 620 Swaffield v R (1996) 88 A Crim R 98 Truong v R (1996) 86 A Crim R 188 Van der Meer v The Queen (1988) 62 ALJR 656 R v Hebert [1990] 2 SCR 151 R v Broyles [1991] 3 SCR 595
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate