NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mid-City Skin Cancer & Laser Centre Pty Ltd v Zahedi-Anarak [2006] NSWSC 615
HEARING DATE(S) : 13/6/06 - 16/6/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 June 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 06/14/2006
DECISION : Evidence rejected
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE – hearsay evidence of a person's state of mind – whether able to be given by a file note which is not itself a business record – EVIDENCE – opinion evidence – whether opinion evidence able to be received under section 78 Evidence Act 1995 when contained in a file note which is not a business record
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995
CASES CITED : Connex Group Australia Pty Ltd v Butt [2004] NSWSC 379 McGregor v Nichol [2003] NSWSC 332
The Mid-City Skin Cancer and Laser Centre Pty Ltd - Plaintiff Ali Zahedi-Anarak - First Defendant PARTIES : Idameneo (No 123) Pty Ltd T/as Sydney Medical Centre - Second Defendant L W Kernot Pty Limited - Third Defendant Laurence William Kernot - Fourth Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2863/02
R D Marshall; P K Bruckner - Plaintiff COUNSEL : J Downing - First Defendant G Lucarelli - Second Defendant R D Wilson; A Eastman - Third and Fourth Defendants
Kelvin Solari - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Yeldham Lloyd Associates - First Defendant Kennedys - Second Defendant Hancock Alldis & Roskov - Third and Fourth Defendants
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EQUITY LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate