NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jackson (previously known as Subramaniam) v Legal Practitioners Admission Board (No. 2) [2006] NSWSC 1403
HEARING DATE(S) : 13 December 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/13/2006
DECISION : The Plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Defendant.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - unsuccessful appeal by Plaintiff against refusal of Legal Practitioners Admission Board to declare Plaintiff to be of good fame and character and otherwise suitable for admission as a legal practitioner - Board applies for costs - role of Board on hearing of appeal - nature of findings made concerning Plaintiff's evidence - finding that significant parts of Plaintiff's evidence were glaringly improbable - costs order made
LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Part 42.1 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
CASES CITED : Jackson (previously known as Subramaniam) v Legal Practitioners Admission Board [2006] NSWSC 1338 Board of Examiners v XY [2006] VSCA 190
PARTIES : Kala Jackson (previously known as Kala Subramaniam) (Plaintiff) Legal Practitioners Admission Board (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12670/03
COUNSEL : Mr T Hall, Solicitor (Plaintiff) Ms TJ Anderson (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Hal Lawyers (Plaintiff) IV Knight, Crown Solicitor's Office (Defendant)
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION : ---
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION : ---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
Johnson J
13 December 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate