NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Limited; Weston v Publishing and Broadcasting Limited [2007] NSWSC 1320 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 12/11/07, 13/11/07, 15/11/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 November 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 15 November 2007
DECISION : Applications for leave to intervene dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - intervention in proceedings - where originating process filed but not served - pending application by plaintiff for extension of time for service - whether named defendants should be heard on that application - CORPORATIONS - winding up - special purpose liquidator - pending application by special purpose liquidator for order varying functions and powers - whether certain persons should be granted leave to be heard on that application
Supreme Court Act 1970, s.23 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999, rule 2.13(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rule 12.11(1)(e)
CASES CITED : Corporate Affairs Commission v Bradley [1974] 1 NSWLR 391
(1) Onefone Australia Pty Limited - First Plaintiff DCA Resources Australia Pty Limited - Second Plaintiff Pacific Finance Group Pty Limited - Third Plaintiff Concept Systems (Australia) Pty Limited - Fourth Plaintiff One.Tel Limited - First Defendant Steven Sherman - Second Defendant Peter Walker - Third Defendant (2) Paul Gerard Weston in his capacity as special purpose liquidator of One.Tel Limited - Plaintiff Publishing and Broadcasting Limited - First Defendant Consolidated Press Holdings Limited - Second Defendant Robbdoc Pty Limited - Third Defendant Toranaga Pty Limited - Fourth Defendant PARTIES : Cavalane Holdings Pty Limited - Fifth Defendant News Limited - Sixth Defendant Leteno Pty Limited - Seventh Defendant James Douglas Packer - Eighth Defendant Peter Wilson Yates - Ninth Defendant Lachlan Keith Murdoch - Tenth Defendant Peter John Macourt - Eleventh Defendant Kevin Beck - Twelfth Defendant Mark Alan Silbermann - Thirteenth Defendant Peter David Howell-Davies - Fourteenth Defendant Pirjo Hannele Kekalainen-Torvinen - Fifteenth Defendant Persons named in Schedule A trading as Freehills who are named in Schedule A to the Statement of Claim filed on 25 May 2007 - Sixteenth Defendant Persons named in Schedule B trading as Ernst & Young who are named in Schedule B to the Statement of Claim filed on 25 May 2007 Persons named in Schedule C trading as Ferrier Hodgson who are named in Schedule C to the Statement of Claim filed on 25 May 2007 - Eighteenth Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate