NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: De Cue Pty Ltd v City of Sydney Council [2007] NSWCA 41
HEARING DATE(S): 5 March 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 March 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Ipp JA; Tobias JA; McColl JA
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 5 March 2007
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS: Environment and planning – Building control – Restricted Premises Act 1943 s 17 – Manner in which a brothel is operated – Whether personal fault on the part of the owner or occupier of a brothel is required for an order under s 17(a) where the brothel is operating lawfully within a development consent
LEGISLATION CITED: Restricted Premises Act 1943 Supreme Court Act 1970
CASES CITED: None
PARTIES: De Due Pty Limited City of Sydney Council
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40838/06
COUNSEL: A: M Sahade R: M Craig QC
SOLICITORS: A: Comino Prassas Solicitors, Bondi Junction R: Maddocks Lawyers, Sydney
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Land & Environment Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): L&E 40301/06
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Preston CJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 6 December 2006
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: City of Sydney Council v De Cue Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 763
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40838/06
IPP JA TOBIAS JA McCOLL JA
Monday 5 March 2007 DE CUE PTY LIMITED v CITY OF SYDNEY COUNCIL Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate