NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 167 A Crim R 565
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v Khazaal [2006] NSWSC 1353
HEARING DATE(S) : 23/11/06, 24/11/06, 28/11/06, 29/11/06, 30/11/06,
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : 1. Order that the Notice of Motion herein be dismissed. I publish my reasons. 2. In relation to the Closed Court hearing, I publish a Confidential judgment. It may be distributed to the parties, other than to the NSW Bar Association and Law Society. It is not to be further disclosed or published without an order by me or another Supreme Court Judge. 3. Stand over the balance of proceedings so that undertakings, in terms agreed between the parties, be given to the Court. 4. I direct that Short Minutes be prepared for this purpose. 5. The proceedings be listed for further mention at 9.30am on Thursday 1 Februaury 2007. 6. Costs of this and the previous motion be reserved for argument. 7. Confidential Exhibits "E", "G", "M" and 8 are to be returned to the tendering parties.
CATCHWORDS : Injunction to restrain lawyers from acting - preserving integrity of judicial process - equitable principles - undertakings to protect confidential information - duty of practitioners in relation to national security information - criminal trial - right of accused to legal representation of his choice
ASIO Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED : National Security Information (Criminal & Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Criminal Code
Alister v R (1984) 154 CLR 404 at 436 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 at 57 R v Khazaal [2006] NSWSC 1061 25 October 2006 Barwick v The Law Society NSW [2000] 74 ALJR 419 at 11 to 13 and 32 to 64 Smyrnis v Legal Practitioners Board [2003] NSWCA 64 at [16] Australian Consolidated Press Limited v Morgan & Anor (1965) 112 CLR 483 at 496 per Windeyer J Selly v Jago (1717) 1 P Wms 389 [24 ER 438 Scarel Ptry Limited v City Loan & Credit Pty Limited (1998) 17 FCR 344 at 348 (Gummow J) Forest View Nominees Pty Limited v Perpetual Trustees Pty Limited (1998) 193 CLR 154 at [16] Lest We Forget Pty Limited v Westpac Banking Corporation [2005] 565 ACSR 126 ar [20] per Barrett J CASES CITED : Rondell v Worsley (1969) 1 AC 191 at 274 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] 79 ALJR 755 at [27] Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 at 317 Emanuele v Emanuele Investmenst (1996) 21 ACSR 83 at 107 Franklin River Oliver Company Limited v Charters Securities Pty Limited [2004] WASC 88 at [25-26] Grimwade v Meagher, & Ors (1995) 1 VR 446 at 450 and 455 United States v Gonzalez-Lopez No 05-352 [26 June 2006] Black v Taylor (1993) 3 NZLR 403 Kallinicos & Anor v Hunt & Ors [2005] 64 NSWLR 561 Spincode v Look Software Pty Limited [2001] 4 VR 501 at [58] T.R. Flanagan Smash Repairs Pty Limited v Jones (1999) FCA 1391 at (16-18) per Hely J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate