NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Barton [2006] NSWSC 1495
HEARING DATE(S) : 08/06/2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Buddin J
DECISION : Objection to evidence concerning subject matter of blackmail upheld.
CATCHWORDS : Charge of murder - Crown relies on fact that deceased blackmailed accused as providing motive for his death - objection to tender of evidence concerning subject matter of blackmail
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act
Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 CASES CITED : R v Clark [2001] NSWCCA 494 R v Kovacs (2000) 111 A Crim R 374 R v Quach [2002] NSWCCA 519
PARTIES : Regina James Harry Barton
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2005/1623
COUNSEL : D Howard SC (Crown) Ms D Yehia (Accused)
SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Director of Public Prosecutions) Legal Aid Commission (Accused)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BUDDIN J
THURSDAY 8 JUNE 2006
1623/2005 - REGINA v JAMES HARRY BARTON
JUDGMENT – Admissibility of evidence concerning subject matter of blackmail
1 HIS HONOUR: Objection was taken on behalf of the accused to certain evidence upon which the Crown seeks to rely at his trial. The accused is charged with a number of offences. The first count charges him with the murder of M. between 2 and 5 September 2004. He is also charged with the murder of M.'s three-year-old daughter, N., between 3 and 6 September 2004. He is further charged with having attempted to murder M.'s five-year-old son, J., on 4 September 2004. In the alternative to that count, he is charged with maliciously destroying property intending thereby to endanger the life of J. (Because N. and J. were children it is necessary to protect their identity and that of other family members).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate