NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 178 A Crim R 220
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: KRISHNA v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 318
HEARING DATE(S): 28 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Latham J at 41; Rothman J at 42
(1) Grant leave to appeal against sentence, and, if necessary, against conviction.
DECISION: (2) Dismiss the appeal against conviction.
(3) Dismiss the appeal against sentence.
CRIMINAL APPEAL – conviction appeal – leave required where grounds not limited to questions of law CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL APPEAL – whether failure to call witness constituted a miscarriage of justice – failure by prosecution to produce weapon – whether issue in prosecution case unsupported by evidence SENTENCE – whether offence fell within mid-range of objective seriousness
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 98 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44, Part 4, Div 1A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 65
Attorney General for the State of NSW v X (2000) 49 NSWLR 653 Australian Gas Light Company v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gaevert (1996) 186 CLR 389 Haider v JP Morgan [2007] NSWCA 158 Hutchinson v RTA [2000] NSWCA 332 CASES CITED: M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454 Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 Ormwave Pty Limited v Smith [2007] NSWCA 210 R v R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74 Richardson v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 116 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate