NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Paino v Paino [2006] NSWSC 218
HEARING DATE(S) : 07/06/05, 08/06/05, 09/06/05, 10/06/05, 15/06/05, 16/06/05, 17/06/05, 21/06/05, 22/06/05, 23/06/05, 24/06/05, 28/06/05, 29/06/05, 01/07/05, 05/07/05, 06/07/05, 12/07/05, 29/07/05, 13/12/05, 14/12/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Defendant to pay plaintiff $2,046,575.90 subject to adjustment
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY LAW - de facto relationships - application by one party for orders adjusting property interests - determination of when relationship began - determination of when relationship ended - determination of dates at which property to be valued - all property owned by defendant - values at various dates agreed - no agreement as to value of land in Queensland - consideration of different views of valuers called by the parties - no agreement as to value of land in Italy - no evidence from which court can decide value of land in Italy - such land left out of account - consideration of parties' respective welfare/homemaker contributions - consideration of plaintiff's claims to have made significant non-financial contribuitions to various businesses owned and operated by defendant - assessment of contributions - decision of what is just and equitable according to holistic value judgment
LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984, ss.4, 5(1), 15(1), 17(1), 18(1), 18(2), 20
Black v Black (1991) 15 Fam LR 109 Chanter v Catts [2005] NSWCA 411 Dwyer v Kaljo (1987) 11 Fam LR 785 Evans v Marmont (1997) 42 NSWLR 70 Green v Robinson (1995) 36 NSWLR 96 Howlett v Neilson (2005) 33 Fam LR 402 Jones v Grech (2001) 27 Fam LR 711 Kardos v Sarbutt [2006] NSWCA 11 Kelly v Clarke [2001] NSWSC 1010 CASES CITED : Livesey v Jenkins [1985] AC 424 Paino v Paino [2005] NSWSC 1313 Paino v Paino [2005] NSWSC 1336 Parker v Parker (1993) 16 Fam LR 863 Parks v Thompson (1997) DFC 95-1 Powell v Supresencia (2003) 30 Fam LR 463 R v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327 Sullman v Sullman [2002] NSWSC 169 Wallace v Stanford (1995) 37 NSWLR 1 White v White [2004] NSWSC 208 Wilson v Vine [2003] NSWSC 341
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate