NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Diesing & Ors v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 326
HEARING DATE(S): 02/08/2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Hoeben J at 1; Latham J at 1; Harrison J at 1
DECISION: Appeals allowed in all applications and new sentences imposed.
CATCHWORDS: Sentence appeals - Judge incorrectly believing that standard non-parole period applied to offence - error conceded - operation of proviso - evaluation by Judge of psychological reports where basis of opinions not disclosed - importance of identifying role of participants in conspiracy - failure to give effect to a finding of special circumstances - parity.
Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Firearms Act 1996
Baxter v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 237 DAC v Regina [2206] NSWCCA 265 at [9]-[10] Elyard v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 43 Ibbs v The Queen; Baumer v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 51 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 at 585 R v Burgess [2006] NSWCCA 319 R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247 CASES CITED: R v Kane [1975] VR 658 R v Nguyen [2005] NSWCCA 362; 157 A Crim R 80 at [10] R v Moon (2000) 117 A Crim R 497 at 510 R v Ohar (2004) 59 NSWLR 596 at [84] R v Reicher [2003] NSWCCA 300 R v So [2004] NSWCCA 362 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Wilkinson [2004] NSWCCA 468 Savvas v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 1 at 7
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate