NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: MD v. Regina [2006] NSWCCA 142
HEARING DATE(S): 21 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; James J at 21; Hoeben J at 22
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeals - Leave to appeal against sentence - Whether manifestly excessive - Whether s.21A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 complied with - Whether appropriate discount given for plea of guilty
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s.21A
Kanaan v. Regina [2006] NSWCCA 109 R v. Ahmadi [1999] NSWCCA 161 R v. Ambatsidis [2000] NSWCCA 125 R v. Dib [2003] NSWCCA 117 CASES CITED: R v. Dimovski NSWCCA 3/8/92 R v. Markarian [2003] NSWCCA 8, 137 A Crim R 497 R v. SY [2003] NSWCCA 291 R v. Tipler [2000] NSWCCA 382 Regina v. Street [2005] NSWCCA 139 Regina v. Walker [2005] NSWCCA 109
PARTIES: MD - Applicant Regina - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/5 CCAP
COUNSEL: Mr. W. Terracini SC with Mr. G.A. Newton for the applicant Mr. G. Rowling for the respondent
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions for respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC02/11/0118
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Taylor J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 02/27/2004
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Not applicable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/5 CCAP DC 02/11/0118
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate