NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Tahi BROOKS v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 169 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 15 August 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Hulme J at 1; Hidden J at 2; Hall J at 25
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed, for re-sentence see para 23
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - charges of aggravated sexual assault - armed robbery - matters on Form 1 - whether sexual offences fell into worst category - whether sentences excessive
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 CASES CITED: R v Blair [2005] NSWCCA 78 R v McQueeney [2005] NSWCCA 168 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
PARTIES: Tahi BROOKS (applicant) REGINA (respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/864
COUNSEL: H Dhanji (applicant) D Frearson SC (respondent)
SOLICITORS: S E O'Connor - Solicitor for Legal Aid (applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/21/1020
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: English DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/864
HULME J HIDDEN J HALL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate