NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: BARRETT v DUBBO CITY COUNCIL [2006] NSWCA 65
HEARING DATE(S): 12/12/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 April 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Bryson JA at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE - occupiers liability - cattle saleyards - Dubbo SC provided use of saleyards in commercial venture - appellant, local manager of pastoral house, worked with other employees drafting cattle along laneway into pens - one beast ran down laneway past pen to which employee attempted to direct it - appellant intervened to protect employee and attempted to direct beast into pen as beast returned up laneway, and beast ran against gate of pen while appellant was behind gate - gate struck appellant causing head injury - laneway not equipped with "interfering gates" meaning gates which extended across whole laneway and were held by opposite pen when fully opened, which would reduce risk to operator behind the gate - pens constructed in 1974 or 1975 without interfering gates - practice in new construction since about 1980 to design and instal interfering gates but use of non-interfering gates continued in saleyards already constructed - no practice of re-equipping existing saleyards - extensive evidence on practice in handling cattle, design and construction of yards pens and gates and safety considerations affecting design - on review of evidence, principally expert evidence on design and conduct of saleyards Studdert J found not negligent to continue to use existing equipment - on appeal, held that no error had been shown - appeal dismissed.
Ahluwalia v Robinson [2003] NSWCA 175 CASES CITED: Barrett v Dubbo City Council [2004] NSWSC 832 Jones v Bartlett (2000) 205 CLR 166
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate