NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Can v R [2007] NSWCCA 176
HEARING DATE(S): 02/05/07, 07/06/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 June 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; James J at 2; Harrison J at 167
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - identification evidence - photographic identification - com-fit photos - verdict not unreasonable
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act Criminal Appeal Act Evidence Act
Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 434 CASES CITED: Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 R v Henry [1999] 46 NSWLR 346
PARTIES: Vural Can v R
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/2741
COUNSEL: Self-represented (Appl) R Herps (Resp)
SOLICITORS: Self-represented (Appl) Director of Public Prosecutions (Resp)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/44/1400
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sorby DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 15/02/06
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/2741
GILES JA JAMES J HARRISON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate