NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Campbell v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 137
HEARING DATE(S): 16 March 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 May 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hulme J at 2; Hislop J at 11
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Sentence - Ellis discount - Sentence not manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 - ss 112(1), 188(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6(3)
Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Harris v R [2007] NSWCCA 130 Markarian v R (2005) 215 ALR 213 R v Bloomfield (1998) 44 NSWLR 734 CASES CITED: R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Veen v R (No2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465 Wong v R (2001) 207 CLR 584
PARTIES: Applicant - Neil Andrew Raymond Campbell Respondent - Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/2745
COUNSEL: Applicant - Ms C. Loukas Respondent - Ms N. Noman
SOLICITORS: Applicant - Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales Respondent - Director of Public Prosecutions (New South Wales)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/11/1055
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Freeman DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 9 February 2006
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/2745
McCLELLAN CJ at CL HULME J HISLOP J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate