NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Stanford v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 73
HEARING DATE(S): 10 November 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 March 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hulme J at 2; Rothman J at 24
DECISION: 1. Grant leave to appeal; 2. Allow the appeal; 3. Quash the sentences imposed on the Applicant by Judge Sides on 15 December 2005 and in lieu thereof sentence the Applicant as follows:; (i) In respect of count 2, sentence the Applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 1 year commencing on 25 January 2005 together with a balance of term of 7 months commencing on 25 January 2006; (ii) In respect of count 3, sentence the Applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 1 year commencing on 25 April 2005 together with a balance of term of 7 months commencing on 25 April 2006; (iii) In respect of count 4, sentence the Applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 1 year commencing on 25 July 2005 together with a balance of term of 7 months commencing on 25 July 2006; (iv) In respect of count 1, and taking into account the offence on the Form 1, sentence the Applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 1 year and 3 months commencing on 25 April 2006 together with a balance of term of 1 year commencing on 25 July 2007; (v) Record as the date upon which it appears to the court that the Applicant will become eligible for parole, 25 July 2007.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – requirement for custodial sentence – accumulation of sentences – totality – impact of theoretical possibility that offence could be dealt with at Local Court – effect of intoxication – quantification of discount for plea of guilty – parity principle not require comparison with sentence for child co-offender.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate