NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Barac v Mood & 3 Ors [2006] NSWSC 738
HEARING DATE(S) : 20/07/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 July 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Administrative Law List
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1
DECISION : Plaintiff's summons dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - plaintiff prevented from entering any correctional centre in New South Wales for 36 months - plaintiff attempted to introduce a mobile phone into a correctional centre - whether the decision by the defendants to prohibit the plaintiff was properly made.
Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 79 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2001 (NSW), cl 93, 97, 105 Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW), s 27E(2)(b)
CASES CITED : Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163
Mercedes Barac (Plaintiff) Barry Mood (First Defendant) PARTIES : Peter Peters (Second Defendant) Ron C Woodham (Third Defendant) The State of New South Wales (Fourth Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30101/05
J Levingston (Plaintiff) Submitting Appearance (First Defendant) COUNSEL : Submitting Appearance (Second Defendant) Submitting Appearance (Third Defendant) N Perram/F Salama (Fourth Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Tully & Co (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor (Fourth Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
IPP JA
Wednesday 26 July 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate