NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : CEO of Customs v Pham [2006] NSWSC 1011
HEARING DATE(S) : 11/9/06, 12/9/06, 13/9/06, 14/9/06, 15/9/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 4 October 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1
DECISION : 1. Vinh Phat Pham (also known at Peter Pham) and Sung Chau Pham (also known as Linda Pham) are each convicted of an offence that he/she did on or about 25 January 2001 at Sydney in the State of New South Wales, smuggle a quantity of cigarettes, namely 2,098,175 cigarette sticks, into Australia contrary to s 233(1)(a) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth); 2. That Vinh Phat Pham (also known as Peter Pham) and Sung Chau Pham (also known as Linda Pham) are each convicted of an offence that on or about 22 January 2001 at Sydney in the State of New South Wales he/she did evade payment of duty which was payable in respect of the importation into Australia of 2,098,175 cigarette sticks contrary to s 234(1)(a) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth); 3. Vinh Phat Pham (also known as Peter Pham) and Sung Chau Pham (also known as Linda Pham) are each convicted of an offence that on or about 22 January 2001 at Sydney in the State of New South Wales, he/she did knowingly or recklessly make a statement to a Customs officer that was false or misleading in a material particular by not declaring the goods contained in a shipping container in Entry for Home Consumption Number 1S.1019.0909P, contained a quantity of cigarettes, namely 2,098,175 cigarette sticks; 4. Vinh Phat Pham (also known as Peter Pham) and Sung Chau Pham (also known as Linda Pham) are each convicted of an offence that on or about 30 January 2001 at Sydney in the State of New South Wales he/she did smuggle cigarettes, namely, 2,099,750 cigarette sticks into Australia contrary to s 233(1)(a) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate