NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave refused with costs by the High Court - 16 May 2008
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: CGU Insurance Ltd v Watson (as trustee of the deed of arrangement in respect of Greaves) [2007] NSWCA 301
HEARING DATE(S): 18 September 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 October 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Giles JA at 2; Basten JA at 82
DECISION: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Direct the appellant's notice of appeal and the respondent's notice of contention be filed within 7 days; (3) Dismiss the appeal with costs.
CATCHWORDS: Practice and procedure - stay of proceedings if costs of prior proceedings unpaid - whether proceedings on the same or substantially similar cause of action - meaning of cause of action - whether claim to declaration a cause of action - nature of claims under contract of insurance - essential facts on which claimant relied in the two proceedings were different - not the same or substantially similar cause of action - no stay.
LEGISLATION CITED: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (C'th), Pt X
Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564; Bowen v Hickey (1958) 78 WN 820; Bowes v Chaleyer (1923) 32 CLR 159; British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v Eagle Star Reinsurance Co Ltd [2006] NSWCA 156; Burghes v Attorney-General (1911) 2 Ch 139; Carter v Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board (Vic) (1942) 66 CLR 557; Conquer v Boot (1928) 2 KB 336; Dunbee Ltd v Gilman & Co (Australia) Pty Ltd (1969) 89 WN (Pt 1) 259; Dyson v Attorney-General (1912) 1 Ch 158; Firma C-Trade SA v Newcastle Protection and Indemnity Association (1991) 2 AC 1; Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers (1978) AC 435; Guaranty Trust Co of New York v Hannay & Co (1915) 2 KB 356; Haines v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1995) 43 NSWLR 404; Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2000] NSWCA 202; Johnston v The Salvage Association (1887) 29 QBD 458; Kone Elevators Pty Ltd v Popa [2006] VSCA 26; CASES CITED: Letang v Cooper (1965) 1 QB 232; Macquarie Bank Ltd v National Mutual Life Association of Australia Ltd (1996) 40 NSWLR 543; Martin v Earl Beauchamp (1883) 25 Ch D 12; McCabe v Bank of Ireland (1889) 14 App Cas 413; Onerati v Phillips Constructions Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (1989) 16 NSWLR 730; Peter Turnbull & Co Pty Ltd v Mundus Trading (A'Asia) Pty Ltd (1954) 90 CLR 235; Penrith City Council v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1991) 24 NSWLR 564; Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 598; Reichel v McGrath (1889) 14 App Cas 665; Republic of India v India Steamship Co (1993) AC 410; Rice v Henley (1915) 32 WN 54; Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1; Sinclair v British Telecommunications plc (2001) 1 WLR 38; State Bank of New South Wales Ltd v Stenhouse Ltd (1997) Aust Torts Rep 81-423; Stingel v Clark (2006) 80 ALJR 1339; West Wake Price & Co v Ching (1956) 3 All ER 821; Williams v Milotin (1957) 97 CLR 465.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate