NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 164 A Crim R 400
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: DRE v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 280
HEARING DATE(S): 6 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 September 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Simpson J at 46; Adams J at 83
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: Conviction appeal - delay - Longman direction - whether adequate - appeal dismissed (by majority)
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Rules r 4 Evidence Act 1906 (WA) s36BE(1)
Crampton v The Queen [2000] HCA 60; 206 CLR 161 Doggett v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 343 JJB v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 126 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 CASES CITED: R v BWT (2002) 54 NSWLR 241 R v DRE [2004] NSWCCA 305 R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 R v Kesisyan [2003] NSWCCA 259 R v WSP [2005] NSWCCA 427 Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192
DRE (Appellant) PARTIES: v REGINA
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2148
COUNSEL: Mr C B Craigie SC (Appellant) Mr P G Ingram (Crown)
SOLICITORS: Mr S O'Connor (Appellant) Mr S Kavanagh (Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/51/0133
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Freeman DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 28/02/05
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/2148
SPIGELMAN CJ SIMPSON J ADAMS J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate