NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State of New South Wales v NatWest Markets Australia No 2 Pty Limited & ors [2006] NSWSC 751
HEARING DATE(S) : 14, 15, 16, 17, and 20 March, 12 May and 20 July 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 July 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Judgment for the defendants on the claim of the plaintiff.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - construction and interpretation of contracts - whether particular provisions of contract gave rise to entitlement to payment of a profit or gain - no entitlement to benefit arises. - LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - contracts - when cause of action arises - period passed - whether dicta of Deane J in in Hawkins v Clayton extends to a breach of contract - no obligation to inform contracting party of breach - Hawkins v Clayton distinguished - claimed barred by Limitation Act
LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969, s14, s23
Cheney v Duncan [2001] NSWCA 197; Downey v Bruce (unreported Supreme Court of South Australia 17 December 1992); Gorton v Commonwealth of Australia [1992] 2 Qd R 603 at 607; Grundy v Lewis (1995) 62 FCR 567 at 576; CASES CITED : Hawkins v Clayton (1987) 164 CLR 539 Pace v Westpac Banking Corporation [2001] QSC 415 at paragraph [46]; GMU Australia Pty Limited v Davidson [2003] NSWSC 311 at 197. Pittaway v W H Tutt & Quinlan [2003] QCA 365; Sampson v Zucker (NSWCA 11 December 1990, BC9606395); Walmsley v Cosentino [2001] NSWCA 403 McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Limited (2000) 203 CLR 579
State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) PARTIES : NatWest Markets Australia No 2 Pty Limited (First Defendant) State Bank of New South Wales Limited (Second Defendant) Rawson Place Pty Limited (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate