NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 160 A Crim R 392
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v F.D; Regina v F.D; Regina v J.D [2006] NSWCCA 31
HEARING DATE(S): 17 August 200
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 February 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1; Hulme J at 147; Hall J at 209
DECISION: In the case of F.D: appeal against conviction dismissed; leave granted to appeal against sentence; appeal against sentence dismissed; In the cases of the Crown appeals against sentence, each such Crown appeal dismissed.
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
M v The Queen (1984) 181 CLR 487 Reg v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 Reg v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 Reg v Bermingham (No. 2) (1997) 96 A Crim R 545 The Queen v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592 Reg v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 Reg v Tzanis [2005] NSWCCA 274 Reg v Reid [2005] NSWCCA 309 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 CASES CITED: Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Richards [1981] 2 NSWLR 464 R v Readman (1990) 47 A Crim R 181 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Previtera (1977) 92 A Crim R 76 Attorney General's Application Under s37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No. 2 of 2002 (2002) 137 A Crim R 196 at [57] R v Berg [2004] NSWCCA 300 R v Tzanis [2005] NSWCCA 274 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 219 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate