NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Halloran v Harwood Nominees Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWSC 1355
HEARING DATE(S) : 04/10/06 JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/04/2006
DECISION : Application for determination of preliminary question declined
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Preliminary or separate questions – total and permanent disablement claim – whether order should be made for determination of validity of trustee's decision as separate question – relevance of Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) principles
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 57
Edwards v Hunter Valley Co-operative Dairy Limited (1992) 7 ANZ Ins Cas 61-113 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Nile v Club Plus Superannuation Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 55 CASES CITED : Rapa v Patience (NSWSC, McLelland J, unreported, 4 April 1985, BC8500888) Re Hannover Life of Australasia Ltd v Sayseng (2005) 13 ANZ Ins Cas 90-123; [2005] NSWCA 214 Sheldon v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 700 Tepko Pty Ltd v The Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1
Mark Halloran (P) PARTIES : Harwood Nominees Pty Ltd ACN 001 216 208 (D1) The National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd ACN 004 020 437 (D2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6149/05
COUNSEL : M Bleasel (P) B Kelleher (D2 & mentioned appearance of D1)
Firths - The Compensation Lawyers (P) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (D1) Deacons (D2)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate