NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Keller v R [2006] NSWCCA 204
HEARING DATE(S): 5 May 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 July 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Studdert J at 1; Hall J at 58; Latham J at 59
DECISION: Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; new trial ordered.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - expert evidence as to the subject matter of conversations being drug supply - whether such evidence should have been admitted - criminal law - expert evidence - sufficiency of summing up.
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act Criminal Appeal Act
HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414 Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 CASES CITED: R v David & Gugea (unreported, NSWCCA, 10 October 1995) R v Huynh (unreported, NSWCCA, 13 May 1996 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 80 ALJR 444
PARTIES: Matthew Glen Keller v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3050
COUNSEL: S. Odgers SC (Appellant) G. Rowling (Crown)
SOLICITORS: Roderick Storie (Appellant) S. Kavanagh (Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 02/11/1263
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Urquhart DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 22 October 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/3050
STUDDERT J HALL J LATHAM J
Wednesday 26 July 2006 MATTHEW GLEN KELLER v REGINA Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate